Good Shepherd Lutheran church

Though we welcome you joining the discussion here online, there really is no substitute for being part of the lively discussion in person. Consider joining us at one of our Bible Studies that you can find at Good Shepherd Lutheran Church. Or follow us on facebook.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Q


I’m sure you’ve been waiting all week to see what would be the topic for the letter Q. Would it be Queen Esther? Quirinius? The Quran? Nope, none of the above!

We are looking at Q.

Now, you may or may not have heard of the synoptic gospels, if you have, you’ve got a great head start, if you haven’t, well, you’ll have something new to show off to your friends.

The synoptic gospels are Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Not John. Poor John! If you’ve ever read through these gospels, you will have likely noticed that they are awfully similar. They have a very comparable focus and even their word choices are remarkably close.

Has that ever made you curious? Ever wondered why that might be?

If you haven’t rest assured that somebody has! This, my friends, is what we are talking about today is Q, otherwise known as the Q-source.

Going in, I was sure that it was called Q just so that people like me would have something unique to bring to the table during an alphabet study, but turns out that it comes from the German word Quelle, meaning source. Would you believe that in a room full of old school Lutherans, not one person knew the proper pronunciation? I couldn’t either!

This Q thing, what is it exactly?  How is it fitting in to all this jibber jabber?

Q is one proposed hypothesis that could explain why everything fits together so nicely. The idea behind Q is that it contains all of the things that Jesus said and authors, especially Matthew and Luke, would be able to use it as a help as they were writing.

Doesn’t seem too ridiculous, after all, look at Luke, he tells us straight up that he is using other sources.

And if we read through an account that is found in both gospels, such as loving your enemies, (Matthew 5:38-48 and Luke 6: 27-36) we see an awful lot of similarity.

But there are also some pretty extreme differences as well. Take for example v. 46 in the Matthew account where it says “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” and compare it to Luke v. 32 “If you love those who love you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them.” (emphasis added) You’ll notice (because I very clearly pointed it out) that Matthew purposefully uses the word tax collector instead of sinner. Could be no big deal, tax collectors were seen as pretty bad dudes, but isn’t it weird that Matthew, the known tax collector would include that in this account? This is something that seems to go beyond just a set of sayings that people were conveying to one another, this really impacted Matthew as he heard it to the point where he wrote it as he understood it, not necessarily as it was commonly expressed.

The idea behind Q is one that would very neatly tie up all the loose ends. When we get confused about how the writings of the Gospels are so similar, it would be easiest to point to one common piece that would solve all of the problems. In doing so, however, we are not giving enough credit to the dynamic qualities of Jesus’ words. When he spoke it was more than just a quote to be transcribed, it was a message to be lived. They were teachings that stuck with people and struck them so deeply that they could insert themselves in the teaching and still have it ring as true as it did when it was preached for anyone else in the crowd.

Q could be a possibility. It’s still a hypothetical source that doesn’t have any physical proof behind it, but it does make sense as a theory. However, what we should not neglect when considering this is the power of Jesus’ words. They were, and are, strong enough to stand on their own, and be remembered and applied by all.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Priesthood

What a terrible movie!
Know what I hate?


Rules!

They’re lame and even though I would consider myself more law-abiding than not, whenever someone tells me to do something there is a little spark of anger that rises up inside of me and rebels.

This, in conjunction with my lack of credentials would make me a terrible, terrible priest.

Old Testament priest, that is.

There are an awful lot of rules that you need to follow to be a priest!

These rules start before you’re even born!

I’d like you to meet stick man Dan. Now stick man Dan is an Israelite. He can trace his genealogy back to the tribe of Benjamin. He cannot be a priest.



Now meet stick man Mark. He is also an Israelite. He is from the tribe of Levi…things are looking good so far! Except stick man Mark is from the descendants of Moses. No priesthood for stick man Mark!

Last, but certainly not least I would like you to meet stick man Chaim. Stick man Chaim is also an Israelite, and like stick man Mark is from the tribe of Levi. There is one slight difference between stickmen Mark and Chaim, however, as stick man Chaim is from the line of Aaron so BOOM he’s a part of the priesthood!

Seems like a weird ruling right? Let’s go way back and see why this is the case!

By way back I mean the tale of the golden calf, which tells us about how the Levites were rewarded with the promise of service to God.   For doing what God told them they were promised a life of prestige and special rewards. A life that would be spent serving God and following his rules.

Now our friend Chaim was a good Jewish boy. He met all the requirements to be a priest. He was 32 years old, never trimmed his beard and all his body parts were shaped as they ought to be.

Reading through some of the requirements for priesthood in the Old Testament makes a person wonder how anyone could attain the level of perfection expected for this position. To serve as God’s holy elect was a huge responsibility! You were expected to live a life as close to God’s as possible! Perfection wasn’t just suggested, it was required! Unless you could live up to the specifications as they were laid out, your blood wasn’t enough to carry you through.

As Christians, this doesn’t come as a shock to us. We realize that we are completely reliant on the blood of someone more important to us to bring us to be part of this priesthood.

1 Peter 2:5-9 declares us to be part of the royal priesthood. It calls us a chosen people and gives a description of what we are expected to do in this position. But even as we go forth in this priesthood, we do so knowing that it’s not because of the perfection that we’ve obtained by our own works. We are able to serve God only because of the high priest who has already prepared the way for us. Unlike the priest of the Old Testament who spent every day in fear of their inability to maintain the perfection required to mediate between man and God, we can give thanks that our high priest has given us the perfection needed to stand before God and to proclaim the greatness of his name to all people.

Friday, January 25, 2013

O is not for Obama


But he will feature prominently.

This week was monumental for our neighbors down south as the celebrated the inauguration of President Obama in his second term as president. Interesting fact: this was the fourth time that Obama was sworn in. Second term, fourth oath.

It’s weird to me that you could take an oath over.

I understand the repeated oath this time, as it was making public what had happened in private earlier, but in the first go round it was to fix an error in the first oath.

An oath is pretty serious business. A promise made in the sight of God. A promise which, according to James 5:12, can lead to some pretty grave consequences if broken.

Now as a Christian I look at condemnation pretty seriously.

Some people don’t.

Some people are accused of not taking the threat of condemnation seriously and some people don’t necessarily understand or care about the severity that is involved with an oath.
We see Jesus himself warning against the taking of oaths due to the danger that is involved for us. We are dumb, folks. We say things in the heat of the moment that we don’t really mean. We declare truth where it is not found. We can harm ourselves enough without bringing down the judgment fires.

An oath is a big deal because we have now moved beyond our own reason and understanding and have brought in that of one much greater and wiser than we could ever even imagine. This is no longer between us and our neighbor but instead between us and God.

As humans we want to be in control. We want to be the final authority and have something that supports our opinion. What really makes us seem powerful is when we can have the authority of God behind us. But sometimes we put it there when we are wrong to do so. We can make a promise that invokes God but doesn’t leave him as the authority; an oath where we are using God to strengthen our argument rather than allowing God to use us to strengthen his argument. We want to fit God into our plans and refuse to really look at what we’re doing. We’re breaking all kinds of commandments; putting ourselves before God, turning ourselves into gods and using his name in vain to support what we want so badly to believe.

Our need for oaths comes from our need to assure everyone that we’re telling the truth. Our own actions really don’t reflect the reality that we want to convey. Our solution? Bring in the one being who can always be believed. Not to look within ourselves for what we can change, what we can do to make ourselves trustworthy, but rather to deflect to the one who can always be trusted.
And were we to try I’m not sure that we could change ourselves enough, I know we couldn’t change or convince those around us to change. As with all things we are dependent on God’s perfection to make us complete. I don’t think we can cut out the concept of oaths from our lives. We need God’s accountability, we need his strength. What we also need is the understanding of how serious this contract is and to enter into the contract with that knowledge.

Sound tough?

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Not-so Nifty for Nineveh in Nahum


So I’m pretty excited to once again be able to make this a double letter post. 2 N’s, no waiting.

Now, when you think Nineveh, I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that your first thought is about Nineveh as we see it in the book of Jonah. Nineveh fares pretty well in this account. They forgot God in the beginning, but with Jonah’s reluctant help they turn from their wicked ways and repent of their evil ways. God forgave the Ninevites and life went on.

But what about the rest of the story?
What happened 100 years after this miraculous occurrence with Jonah and the massive repentance and sack cloth? Did the Ninevites become master evangelists? Was this major city turned into a religious hub? Did the Ninevites continue to recount the near miss they had when the Lord nearly destroyed the entire city?

None of that happened! In  a relatively minor amount of time the Ninevites forgot the warning from God and returned to their former lifestyle. They did not continue in the repentant lifestyle but instead turned once again to murder, looting and warfare. Nineveh was just as bad, if not worse, than what we saw in the beginning of Jonah.

This is where Nahum begins.

Nahum begins by reminding us that God is faithful to his people, those who believe in Him, and against all others he is to be feared. He doesn't conveniently forget his promises, nor does he forget the ways that those who oppose him have sinned in their transgressions.
Nineveh has done so much to deserve God’s wrath. Sneak forward a bit to Nahum 3:1-7. What a description! It disturbs me as much as it intrigues me!

When I read through I like to read really quickly over these descriptions because it’s terrifying to think of someplace that would cause so much damage. It’s the same way as I read Jesus’ being beaten. It’s a very short passage, and in my mind it gets translated to something quite brief as well. I would very much like to downplay the hurt he suffered and the grief he was caused because I know the reason behind it.

With the crucifixion, with the people of Nineveh I would like to turn my eyes from the pain being inflicted.

In my life, I would like to turn my eyes from the pain being inflicted.

We can very easily look at Nineveh as an evil place. We can look at them as murderers and terrible people but we quickly dismiss is as it is so different from the life we’re living now. We aren't that bad.

They did the same thing.

When they were directly confronted with the fact that they were terrible people they came up with a solution; a bandaid solution that hid the wound, but didn’t heal the brokenness beneath. They repented, put on the sackcloth and asked God to forgive him, and He did.

Unfortunately this wasn’t something that they actually believed beyond the scope of this one time occurrence. As soon as they were forgiven, they went back to their evil ways and felt no remorse. The sins that they repented of were the same ones to which they returned.

This is the danger that we face too. The sins that we confess are the same ones that we are faced with continually. We want to ignore the ugly parts of our lives in the same way we ignore the ugly parts of the bible. We want to pretend it didn’t happen because it makes us feel bad.

It's the warning that we see in the book of Nahum. While we know that “The Lord is good, a stronghold in the day of trouble” (Nahum 1:7a) and that He has made this promise for us, we do so knowing the inherent danger of being complacent in our salvation. When we try to edit out the sinful parts of our life and concentrate only on the good we've done we put ourselves in the same boat as the people of Nineveh.

It’s only when we’re honest with ourselves, when we continually acknowledge our sins both to God AND ourselves that we realize how badly we need forgiving. We’re going beyond just covering up our brokenness but we’re asking God to heal us from the inside out.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

M&M: Not Just a delicious candy


I have a sister.

She is a younger sister.

Sometimes I consider her to be the laziest person in the world. Usually this comes about when I think she should be helping me.

I identify wholeheartedly with Martha.

Luke 10:38-42 is a hard passage to read for this very reason because I, like Martha, and I’m assuming like several others love lists. Whether they’re written or not I usually have about 10 lists on the go. The work list, the grocery list, the housework list, the friends list, the free time list, and honestly the list goes on! If someone or something throws this list out of whack I am so lost. I get unreasonably upset, or I try to ignore the disruption to my list and things end up in a mess.

This is how I picture Martha. I feel like she gets a bad rap sometimes as everyone says that you need to be a Mary, not a Martha but Martha isn’t all wrong. Let’s look closer. Martha enters our story as the hospitable friend. Out of the goodness of her heart she invites Jesus, and presumably all the disciples with him to her house. She cooks, cleans, offers them a place to clean up and she does it all by herself. In theory her sister Mary should have been helping her, but she was off hanging out with the guests and shirking her responsibilities as co-hostess. You’ve been in that situation. You’ve hosted the party, or helped someone with a task only to find that you’re the only person doing any work. It’s frustrating! But when she tried to go and get back-up she found herself being thrown under the bus. Hardly seems fair!

Being a Martha is being a doer. But being a doer often means forgetting to take care of oneself. Martha was so busy taking care of Jesus that she missed the opportunity that was right in front of her. She had the opportunity to be served by Jesus but she was so busy serving him that she didn’t even see it.

The funny thing about Martha is that she had an amazing faith.

John 11:25-27
25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, 26 and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?” 27 She said to him, “Yes, Lord; I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who is coming into the world.”

Very similar to another person’s ground breaking (errr ground supporting?) proclamation, isn’t it?
In spite of the manner in which she is portrayed, her ultimate goal is not to follow the traditional ways beyond all else. In the passage above we see that she forgoes the only faith and culture that she has ever known and declare her belief in a prophet that the religious leaders all denied. Martha is a lot like all of us; she declares her faith but has trouble matching her actions.
The true story doesn’t revolve around the fact that Mary wanted to learn, nor the fact that Martha wanted to serve, but instead it encourages the understanding of the need for both elements.
If we were to all be Mary we would be a very well-learned bunch. We would take every opportunity to read the Word, to be attentive to Jesus’ teachings and to try and learn more each day; where would that lead us? We would know a lot but if we look to James, we know that faith without works is dead.

If we were all to be Martha we would be gracious(ish) servants. We would constantly be feeding the poor, donating all that we have and making sure that those around us were well taken care of; but at what cost? We would be tired and resentful. We would do what we did not because we wanted to, but because we felt that was what was expected of us.

Instead Jesus is pushing for a combination of the two women’s characteristics. First and foremost, we should be equipping ourselves. We need to be aware of Christ’s love, of what he has done for us. We should not be ignoring his teachings and going off, trying to serve everyone but ourselves. In the same breath, we need to realize that these teachings aren’t meant to dwell within us. We are called to be servants, to spread the love that we have received from Christ with all those around us.

We are not called to be Mary. Neither are we called to be Martha. We are called to constantly strive for a greater understanding of Christ and to respond to his great love by reaching out to everyone around us.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

G is for the Gospel. G is for Grace. G is Great.


Gospel is one of those words that goes 1 of two ways:
  1. The Gospel of St Mark
  2. Law and Gospel

It doesn’t seem to be a word that stands alone. It’s 1 of 4 books describing Jesus’ life, or else it’s the counterpart of the Law. It seems like you never see the Gospel on its own.

I’m about to blow your mind baby.

Now the word Gospel is often described as being the good news. In a scriptural context it’s the good news of Christ. It is used as a way to tell all nations about the promise that has come about as a result of Christ’s coming to earth.

In a law and gospel context it’s the good news that comes about as a result of our inabilities as pointed out in the law. It is through this use of the Gospel that our sinful nature has been recognized and remedied with the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.

The gospel becomes much more than the reading that we hear on Sunday morning and more than the partner to law; it is the way we are saved. Good news is too mundane a term to describe the Gospel as it is brought forth in 1 Corinthians 15:1-2. The gospel is something that is preached, sure, but beyond that it is the promise on which we stand firm, and the promise that saves us from eternal death.

I had considered filling up the entire conversation with talk about the gospel, but it’s unfair to ignore the other g that goes along with it, which is grace.

Now if you’re like me you learned the definition for grace with this lovely acronym:

God’s
Riches
At
Christ’s
Expense

If you didn’t learn that, well, good luck forgetting it now! The other definition that I found recently is equally as lovely which describes grace as “kindness bestowed upon someone undeserving.” I love it. It describes us perfectly! What greater kindness could there be than that which was shown on the cross at Calvary? Who could be more undeserving than us mere mortals who are forever trapped in the inequity of our sins?
The writer of Romans and Ephesians describe this condition of grace as follows:

Romans 11:5-6:So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace. But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.

Romans 3:23-24:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,

Ephesians 4:7:But grace was given to each one of us according to the measure of Christ's gift.

Ephesians 2:8-9:For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.

We are chosen by grace. We don’t do anything to deserve it, in fact we can’t do anything to deserve it because we all fall short, we all are sinners from birth who can do nothing but be terrible. But, we are reminded that the good news that we have received, the promise of salvation comes about according to Christ’s gift and nothing that we have done.

As much as we try to hammer home the point this idea of free grace it’s hard to think that we could receive something without working for it.

This is where our Gospel and grace coincide. They’re like the peanut buttah and the jelly. They really need one another to really make sense. So you’ve got the Gospel, the good news which is super but unless you can apply it to yourself, it’s not that great at all. When it’s just a message floating out there, not really applicable to anyone, it’s no good. Sinful beings though we are, we can’t claim it as our own; we need someone to give it to us. Here’s where we get our message of grace. Grace is the message that this good news is applied to you. Without the message of the Gospel, grace is pointless. Grace without the gospel is like a present with nothing in it…just terribly disappointing.

This is then our letter G- Gospel and Grace. The message that Jesus came to earth, that he lived, died, and was resurrected and even more than that; this was done for you because you couldn’t ever do anything to deserve it. Due to the fact that you are a total screw-up, due to the fact that I’m a total screw-up the Gospel message was given to each of us, through the grace that can only be found in this sacrifice. 

Monday, November 5, 2012

Living in Hope


One of the greatest moments in my life came the week I was leading the study. I got the chance to reuse my joke about hoping that the Riders would win the Grey Cup and because it was entirely new group of people, they all went for it! Score one for Amanda!!

This wouldn’t be a proper bible study on hope if I didn’t use Hebrews 11:1. Have a peek and you’ll see why…

Now you know the definition that we’re using and we can move on from there.

Things hoped for; what does that look like? What do we really hope for? In everyday conversation you might hear someone say “I hope this wind lets up,” or “I hope that never happens to me.” The hopes that are being expressed are describing something that isn’t currently happening. It is currently windy; you wish it were not. You are currently afraid of something; you wish that you would not be. If the only child says “I wish I had a sister,” it sounds normal. When I, with one young sister say, “I wish I had a sister,” people look at me funny. When we put our hope in Christ, what we’re saying is that our hope is in something better than what we have in this world.

Unfortunately, in using the word hope as any of us would use it in a sentence, it creates a simile to wish. And a wish is something that we want, but realize is not a certainty. Our hope in Christ is different though, because it is a certainty. We have the wisdom of those who have gone before us. Our hope is built on the faith given to us by the Holy Spirit, but solidified by the hope that was shown by the writers of the gospels and the people of the Old Testament who lived out their faith in everything that they did.

Our hope is one that extends beyond the boundaries of this life here on earth. Our hope is that which is found in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-14. We state every week that we believe in the resurrection of the dead and the life everlasting. Everything else that has been said has been leading up to this statement: Our hope is in the resurrection. There’s no other reason that we are without ignorance in death, that we live unlike those that have no hope than the fact that we believe that Jesus died, rose and ascended into heaven and he promises that we will too. Our hope is in a resurrected Saviour and the promise that we too will join him in eternal perfection.